Star Ledger

October 31, 2003

 

Star Ledger Slams GOP's Message as "bogus"

********
BIG NEWS
********

Today the Star Ledger, in 301 words, managed to expose the entire Republican message on taxes this year as "bogus.

As Republicans campaign for their agenda of tax giveaways for giant corporations and an increased tax burden on regular property tax payers, we must make sure that hard-working families turn out to vote on November 4 to vote Democrat.



Star Ledger Editorial
Friday, October 31, 2003

FALSE CLAIM ON TAXES

In an election campaign devoid of serious policy discussion, Republicans are trying to paint Gov. James E. McGreevey as a tax-and- spend liberal, a strategy that worked well against Jim Florio.

It is a bogus charge. McGreevey inherited an even worse budget crisis and managed it with a much smaller tax hike, one that plugged inexcusable loopholes in the state business tax. Before the change, 30 of the 50 largest corporations in the state were paying the statutory minimum tax of $200, less than is owed by a single janitor who cleaned the corporate bathrooms.
Those who advocate repeal would resurrect that injustice.

Granted, McGreevey could have created a fairer tax without raising the total burden on the business community. But would that have been wise? During the 1990s, the share of state taxes paid through the corporate business tax dropped roughly in half, thanks in part to the loopholes that allowed most of the biggest companies to evade it.

That burden has gradually shifted to other state taxes, like income and sales. Draining the state treasury also pushes up local property taxes as state aid is pinched off. Without this reform, which raised an additional $1.7 billion last year, deeper cuts in local aid would have been inevitable.

Republicans offer one more argument: The business tax kills jobs. Again, the argument is unconvincing. New Jersey has seen a net gain of 31,800 jobs this year, according to the Labor Department. New York and Pennsylvania both have lost jobs, as has the nation as a whole.

Next time a candidate talks about the evils of this tax increase, try an experiment: Ask him to offer a better solution for closing that $1.7 billion gap without it. We ask that question all the time. And we're still waiting for a credible answer.